Risks of Foreign Control: The Iberdrola-Avangrid Acquisition and Its Implications for U.S. Energy Infrastructure

 The acquisition of Avangrid by Iberdrola, detailed in a recent Utility Dive article, highlights growing concerns about the foreign ownership of U.S. energy infrastructure. This trend poses significant risks to national security, economic stability, and energy independence, as evidenced by the broader landscape of non-U.S.-owned energy assets.

National Security Concerns

Foreign ownership of critical energy infrastructure can compromise national security. The energy sector is a prime target for cyberattacks, with incidents on the rise globally. When foreign entities control critical infrastructure, the risk of these assets being used as leverage in geopolitical conflicts increases. According to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the energy sector is highly vulnerable to cyber threats, which could be exacerbated by foreign control, potentially allowing adversaries to exploit these vulnerabilities more effectively.

Economic Stability and Domestic Investment

Economic stability is another area of concern. Foreign-owned energy companies might prioritize profit repatriation over local reinvestment, which can reduce the U.S. economy's economic benefits. Research by the Economic Policy Institute indicates that foreign ownership often results in lower levels of reinvestment in local economies compared to domestic firms. This trend can hinder local job creation and economic growth, as foreign companies may have different commitments to the U.S. workforce and economy.

Atlas Project Support LLC

Energy Independence and Policy Control

Maintaining energy independence is crucial for national security and economic stability. When foreign companies control significant portions of the U.S. energy infrastructure, policy decisions regarding energy production, distribution, and pricing could be influenced by foreign interests. This situation could conflict with U.S. energy policies and goals, undermining efforts to achieve energy independence. The International Energy Agency stresses the importance of controlling energy assets to ensure stable and secure energy supplies.

Global Examples of Foreign Ownership Risks

Examining global examples further highlights the risks associated with foreign ownership. The United Kingdom has faced national security debates due to significant portions of its energy infrastructure being owned by foreign companies. Similarly, in Canada, foreign control over energy resources has raised concerns about sovereignty and control over natural resources. These cases illustrate the potential downsides of allowing foreign entities to control critical energy infrastructure.

Conclusion

While foreign investment can bring much-needed capital and expertise, foreign entities' control of critical energy infrastructure poses risks that far outweigh the benefits. It is essential to ensure significant domestic ownership and control of energy assets to protect national security, economic stability, and energy independence. This approach will help align strategic decisions with national interests, supporting the long-term sustainability and security of the U.S. energy supply.

Sources:

• Department of Homeland Security: Energy Sector Vulnerabilities
• Economic Policy Institute: Impact of Foreign Ownership on Local Economies
• International Energy Agency: Energy Independence and Security
• Utility Dive: Iberdrola to Acquire Avangrid

Published by

Atlas Project Support LLCAtlas Project Support LLC

239 followers239 followers

Published • 4s

The acquisition of Avangrid by the Spanish energy giant Iberdrola raises significant concerns about the increasing foreign ownership of U.S. energy infrastructure. This trend poses risks to national security, economic stability, and energy independence. National security is compromised when critical infrastructure falls under foreign control, potentially leaving it vulnerable to geopolitical tensions and cyber threats. Economically, foreign ownership can lead to reduced local reinvestment and job creation, as foreign entities often prioritize profit repatriation over domestic growth. Furthermore, energy independence is undermined when policy decisions regarding energy production and distribution are influenced by foreign interests, potentially conflicting with national goals and strategies.

Examining global examples, such as the United Kingdom and Canada, where significant portions of energy infrastructure are foreign-owned, highlights the potential downsides of this trend. These cases illustrate the importance of maintaining significant domestic ownership to ensure that strategic decisions remain aligned with national interests, supporting long-term sustainability and security. This article delves into the implications of the Iberdrola-Avangrid acquisition, underscoring the need for careful consideration of foreign investments in critical U.S. energy assets.

hashtag#EnergySecurity hashtag#ForeignOwnership hashtag#NationalSecurity hashtag#EconomicStability hashtag#EnergyIndependence hashtag#Iberdrola hashtag#Avangrid hashtag#RenewableEnergy hashtag#USInfrastructure hashtag#PolicyControl hashtag#LocalInvestment hashtag#CyberSecurity hashtag#Geopolitics hashtag#atlasprojectsupport @myatlasproject hashtag#myatlasproject hashtag#AtlasSmartAI
Atlas Project Support
Joao Vilau Fulumbi
Lanett Blaylock